The report came to the following conclusions:
- The balls used by the New England Patriots were intentionally under-inflated.
- There was a sophisticated scheme of deception employed by Patriots employees.
- Staff members of the Patriots admitted they carried out the act.
- The guilty staff members said they did so at the direction of the starting quarterback, Tom Brady.
- The employees of the Patriots involved turned over their phone records, emails, and text messages on this point, and fully participated in the investigation interviews.
- Tom Brady refused to turn over any phone records, emails, or text messages. And Mr Brady gave an interview that was directly contradicted by the Patriots employees in question.
- The report concluded that Tom Brady did not fully comply with the process.
- The report concluded that Mr. Brady more likely as not did as he was alleged to have done.
This may seem like a trivial matter. Let me be clear, it is not trivial at all. The Patriots as an organization CHEATED and broke the rules of the game. An under-inflated football is easier to catch, easier to handle, less likely to fumble. In a game of inches like professional football, any advantage in a game of similarly skilled pros can be massive, and make the difference between a win and a loss.
The NFL has clear and unambiguous rules on the nature of the footballs, and how they are to be inflated. There is process whereby all of the rules are validated as it relates to the status of the individual footballs prior to the game start. The NFL rules were broken in the case, and according to the report, the rules were broken at the direction of Tom Brady, starting quarterback, public face of the Patriots franchise.
Now let me be clear, this was not a criminal proceeding. Mr Wells was not required to prove beyond a reasonable doubt. He was required to prove preponderance of the evidence. Having read through what is available, he did just that. And given the lack of willingness of Mr Brady to fully participate in the process, it is clear what took place.
Before my legal background friends interject let clarify one point. Mr Brady is required to fully participate in any investigation brought forward by the NFL as a condition of employment. He does not have the same rights he would have in a criminal proceeding. He does not have the right to remain silent. It is understood that compliance is required. It was why Mr Goodell did not bother with giving Mr Wells subpoena power. It was clear all players will comply fully.
There is no way to sugar coat this. Rules were broken. The extent to which this cheating may never be fully known. The validity of this year's Super Bowl championship is tainted. Did the Patriots deserve to be in the Super Bowl? We will never know the answer to that question.
The real question is what to do now. Do you punish the entire organization for the actions of a handful of people in the Patriots organization. In team sports that is exactly what happens. One player commits a penalty, the whole team suffers. It is painful, and costly, but that is the nature of professional football.
I feel that the commissioner has no choice but to void the Patriots championship last year and award it to the Seattle Seahawks. Further I think it is clear that the Patriots staff members that broke the rules should be fired and barred from participating with the NFL in any way ever again. Tom Brady should be suspended from the league for no less than an entire season, and be forced to forfeit all pay and benefits for this season. Any bonuses Mr Brady was paid for last season's 'performance' should be repaid. He should further be barred from consideration for the NFL Hall of Fame ever.
I further believe the Patriots franchise should be stripped of all of next year's draft picks and be forced to be a serious fine. All wins from last year should be voided. Let's remember this is not the first offense for this organization. They were found to be cheating in a Super Bowl in the past.
I don't say any of that lightly. I am not being flippant here. And I am not being a Patriots hater. I am a fan of the game. I take seriously the rules under which the game is supposed to be played. I take seriously the notion that the game is supposed to be fair to all teams, and all opportunities in any football contest should be available to both teams. Anything else is not fair to both teams. Unfair contests lead to unfair results which erodes the faith of the fans in the outcome of games.
The substance 'stick em' was banned because it violated the integrity of the game. It gave players that used it an advantage over players that didn't. The use was banned to protect the integrity of the game. The same is true here. Both teams did not play the game with under-inflated balls, which calls into question the overall outcome of at least one game and given Mr. Brady's lack of honesty and compliance with the investigation we do not know how many games were played with under-inflated balls.
The integrity of the game of football was violated. Last season was a mockery of the game. In order to restore the faith of the fans in the game, this should not be taken lightly!